Trump’s lawyer made outlandish claims of broad and comprehensive presidential immunity that liberal and conservative justices seemed not to buy.

Let’s take a look at a couple of the claims.

Trump’s lawyer John Sauer argued that Trump has the legal authority to create fake slates of electors:

Trump’s lawyer, when asked if Trump has immunity to create a fake slate of electors to overthrow an election, “Absolutely, your honor. We have the historical precedent we cite in the lower courts of President Grant sending federal troops to Louisiana and Mississippi in 1876.” pic.twitter.com/jajj3TcLdu

To get more stories like this, subscribe to our newsletter The Daily.

— Sarah Reese Jones (@PoliticusSarah) April 25, 2024

Trump legal team also argued that stealing classified documents, the 1/6 attack and trying to overturn the presidential election were all Trump acting in his official capacity as president:

Trump’s lawyer argues trying to overthrow an election, the 1/6 attack, and stealing classified docs were official acts, “Prosecuting the president for his official acts is an innovation with no foothold in history or tradition and incompatible with our constitutional structure.” pic.twitter.com/ZRk7tf94MK

— Sarah Reese Jones (@PoliticusSarah) April 25, 2024

As George Conway pointed out on X, you know things aren’t going well when Sotomayor and Alito are tag teaming a lawyer with skeptical questions:

I can say with reasonable confidence that if you’re arguing a case in the Supreme Court of the United States and Justices Alito and Sotomayor are tag-teaming you, you are going to lose.

— George Conway (@gtconway3d) April 25, 2024

The Trump legal team has consistently demonstrated that they have no credible legal point to be made on this issue. The argument itself shows why it was a waste of critical and precious time for the Supreme Court to ever agree to hear this case.

Trump is not making argument to protect a president. He is arguing that the president is a dictator that can do what he/she pleases, and is only bound by the remedy of impeachment and conviction. The Trump argument is that the law does not apply to presidents.

It is perhaps the most anti-democracy argument ever made before the Supreme Court, and even this conservative majority isn’t buying it.

President Biden is literally rebuilding America, while prosecutors are building a case that could convict Donald Trump.

A Special Message From PoliticusUSA

If you are in a position to donate purely to help us keep the doors open on PoliticusUSA during what is a critical election year, please do so here. 

We have been honored to be able to put your interests first for 14 years as we only answer to our readers and we will not compromise on that fundamental, core PoliticusUSA value.